Thursday, December 31, 2009

LJj Speaks: Live It Up in 2010! Avoid the dreaded diet for your business or life - it has the word die in it!

Posted via email from LJJ Speaks!

Death to Culdesacs? Interesting story by FastCompany

     Death to Dead Ends: Will the New Suburbia Omit Cul-de-Sacs?

BY Michael CannellTue Dec 29, 2009 at 10:51 AM

cul-de-sacs

What could be more American than the suburban cul-de-sac, that leafy and lonely fixture of post-war development? For better or worse, the quiet, meandering dead-end arteries are America's post-war contribution to landscaping history. Now, as planners try to adapt the American dream to the new realities of sustainability, cul-de sacs are under attack.

Earlier this year Virginia became the first state to encourage walkable neighborhoods by limiting the use of cul-de-sacs. State rules now require that subdivisions have through streets connecting them to adjacent residences and shopping areas. Developments that ignore the new rules will be denied snowplowing and other state services. Research shows that neighborhoods with more street connections and intersections reduce car use. Some of the country's most progressive-minded cities, including Portland, Oregon, and Austin, Texas, have also made it difficult to build new cul-de-sac subdivisions.


Planners are at odds with real-estate developers who say buyers still gravitate to cul-de-sacs. Those quiet streets with five houses clustered around a circular driveway look like places children can frolic in safety, and homeowners like the idea of access restricted to a single road. "The first lots sold are often on the cul-de-sacs because they are safe," Mike Toalson, executive vice president of the Home Builders Association of Virginia, told the Washington Post. "Crooks look for multiple exits."


But appearances can deceive. All indications are that cul-de-sacs are less safe than pre-war neighborhoods layed out in the traditional grid. An article by Philip Langdon in the Jan/Feb 2009 issue of New Urban News shows that, according California accident statistics, cul-de-sac neighborhoods see more car crashes than the denser pre-war neighborhoods. The older grid patterns also have quicker response times for fire trucks and other emergency vehicles. And accidents and crimes in the older neighborhoods are more likely to be reported faster since they have more people on the streets.


Not surprisingly, the recession has also cast doubt on the financial underpinnings of the suburban cul-de-sac. In August, The New York Times profiled a single cul-de-sac, called Beth Court, in Moreno Valley, California where half the homes have been in foreclosure since the housing bubble burst. The homes are now worth less than half the price paid for them.


Planners say the circular, meandering cul-de-sac layout requires circuitous drives to even the closest locations John Michlig, who writes a suburban planning blog called Sprawled Out, says that it takes city crews six times as long to performance cleaning and other services in his Wisconsin suburb as it would in a grid neighborhood.

Posted via email from LJJ Speaks!

This is why @tgates48 / Tony Gates and FaceBook has re-energized my Old Year Resolution!

I have made my declaration known. Now that I've stepped on the scale - I am adding successful pounds to that goal (I first said lose 25 pounds in 2010 then stepped on the scale and gasped!) 

New Year Resolution:  39 Pounds Lighter in 2010!

Thank you to Tony Gates - Professional Motivator and Coach!  
Thank you to my new Gal Pals who are in joined the FB Group to lose weight and gain even more success!

Tony commented on my blog post on Renewing Old Resolutions:   (  Link to blog post here: http://bit.ly/6bxXLn  )

Tony Gates said...
I LOVE it, Lynne!! You have, effectively, broke the cycle you were in. You've done it differently, so your results will be different. Your implementation will be different, and, as a result, your LIFE will be different! You have made my month!!

You should now put up your starting weight (not necessarily known to everybody, unless you want, it, but at least known to a few close friends) and your goal weight.

Weigh in weekly (no more often). I recommend you weigh in completely unclothed and immediately after waking up on whatever morning you designate your weigh-in day. Use the same scale throughout the process (a digital scale that reads in tenths of a pound).

I am more than willing to "referee" it for you!

By the way, my Twitter is at http://twitter.com/tgates48, and my Linked in is at http://linkedin.com/in/tgates48

I'm in your corner!



LJj says:  OK Gulp for all to see.


Current Weight:  163.8

Success! Weight:  125



Join me in the LIVE IT! (why would I go on a diet - that has the word DIE in it!) 

Posted via email from LJJ Speaks!

SmartBrief on Leadership: Why You Should Fire Yourself

Why You Should Fire Yourself

But why did it take a virtual purge for GM's executives to realize that it was time for change? Wasn't bankruptcy, a federal bailout, a near-death experience, and international embarrassment enough of a wake up call? Didn't former CEO Henderson and his team understand the urgency for turning around GM?

Unfortunately, the GM situation reflects the reality that most managers become enamored with their own strategies and have trouble breaking free of their tried and true patterns. In other words, even when we intellectually understand that the world has changed and we need to do things differently, it's difficult to let go. We become invested in what we've created and how we've learned to do things. And it's not just managers at a troubled company like GM; it's all of us.

Jack Welch used to gather his senior executives together in January and tell them to act as though they had just been newly appointed to their jobs. What would they do differently if they were coming in to their business without preconceived notions and with a completely fresh perspective? It's a powerful question, and one that most of us never ask ourselves.

Naturally, it's easier to take a fresh perspective when you really are new and when the assumptions you are questioning are not your own. We're all more comfortable challenging someone else's thinking than stepping back and critically assessing our own ideas and behaviors. That's why Ed Whitacre needed to shake up GM's management team — because the incumbents couldn't get enough distance to challenge the way things had previously been done.

But why wait for your company to get in trouble and for the board of directors to shake up the management team? The turning of the calendar year is a good time for every manager to take stock and think about what you would do if you were starting fresh. So here's a thought-exercise you can do: First, take a deep breath and fire yourself. That's right — take yourself out of your job so that you'll get some distance from it.

Second, consider what you would do to reapply for your job. What are your qualifications? What would you say in an interview about the changes you would make and the improvements you would engineer? What unique "stamp" would you put on this new job? How do you feel about the business strategy and the quality of the leadership team? What would you change?

Answering these questions candidly and constructively can not only help your business to thrive — it also can reenergize you for the coming year.

And who knows? Maybe you'll end up re-hiring you.


Ron Ashkenas is a managing partner of Robert H. Schaffer & Associates a Stamford, Connecticut consulting firm and the author of Simply Effective: How to Cut Through Complexity in Your Organization and Get Things Done

Posted via email from LJJ Speaks!

Article From the Economist: Women’s economic empowerment is arguably the biggest social change of our times.

We did it!

Dec 30th 2009
From The Economist print edition

The rich world’s quiet revolution: women are gradually taking over the workplace

AT A time when the world is short of causes for celebration, here is a candidate: within the next few months women will cross the 50% threshold and become the majority of the American workforce. Women already make up the majority of university graduates in the OECD countries and the majority of professional workers in several rich countries, including the United States. Women run many of the world’s great companies, from PepsiCo in America to Areva in France.

Women’s economic empowerment is arguably the biggest social change of our times. Just a generation ago, women were largely confined to repetitive, menial jobs. They were routinely subjected to casual sexism and were expected to abandon their careers when they married and had children. Today they are running some of the organisations that once treated them as second-class citizens. Millions of women have been given more control over their own lives. And millions of brains have been put to more productive use. Societies that try to resist this trend—most notably the Arab countries, but also Japan and some southern European countries—will pay a heavy price in the form of wasted talent and frustrated citizens.

This revolution has been achieved with only a modicum of friction (see article). Men have, by and large, welcomed women’s invasion of the workplace. Yet even the most positive changes can be incomplete or unsatisfactory. This particular advance comes with two stings. The first is that women are still under-represented at the top of companies. Only 2% of the bosses of America’s largest companies and 5% of their peers in Britain are women. They are also paid significantly less than men on average. The second is that juggling work and child-rearing is difficult. Middle-class couples routinely complain that they have too little time for their children. But the biggest losers are poor children—particularly in places like America and Britain that have combined high levels of female participation in the labour force with a reluctance to spend public money on child care.

Dealing with the juggle

These two problems are closely related. Many women feel they have to choose between their children and their careers. Women who prosper in high-pressure companies during their 20s drop out in dramatic numbers in their 30s and then find it almost impossible to regain their earlier momentum. Less-skilled women are trapped in poorly paid jobs with hand-to-mouth child-care arrangements. Motherhood, not sexism, is the issue: in America, childless women earn almost as much as men, but mothers earn significantly less. And those mothers’ relative poverty also disadvantages their children.

Demand for female brains is helping to alleviate some of these problems. Even if some of the new theories about warm-hearted women making inherently superior workers are bunk (see article), several trends favour the more educated sex, including the “war for talent” and the growing flexibility of the workplace. Law firms, consultancies and banks are rethinking their “up or out” promotion systems because they are losing so many able women. More than 90% of companies in Germany and Sweden allow flexible working. And new technology is making it easier to redesign work in all sorts of family-friendly ways.

Women have certainly performed better over the past decade than men. In the European Union women have filled 6m of the 8m new jobs created since 2000. In America three out of four people thrown out of work since the “mancession” began have been male. And the shift towards women is likely to continue: by 2011 there will be 2.6m more female than male university students in America.

The light hand of the state

All this argues, mostly, for letting the market do the work. That has not stopped calls for hefty state intervention of the Scandinavian sort. Norway has used threats of quotas to dramatic effect. Some 40% of the legislators there are women. All the Scandinavian countries provide plenty of state-financed nurseries. They have the highest levels of female employment in the world and far fewer of the social problems that plague Britain and America. Surely, comes the argument, there is a way to speed up the revolution—and improve the tough lives of many working women and their children?

If that means massive intervention, in the shape of affirmative-action programmes and across-the-board benefits for parents of all sorts, the answer is no. To begin with, promoting people on the basis of their sex is illiberal and unfair, and stigmatises its beneficiaries. And there are practical problems. Lengthy periods of paid maternity leave can put firms off hiring women, which helps explain why most Swedish women work in the public sector and Sweden has a lower proportion of women in management than America does.

But there are plenty of cheaper, subtler ways in which governments can make life easier for women. Welfare states were designed when most women stayed at home. They need to change the way they operate. German schools, for instance, close at midday. American schools shut down for two months in the summer. These things can be changed without huge cost. Some popular American charter schools now offer longer school days and shorter summer holidays. And, without going to Scandinavian lengths, America could invest more in its children: it spends a lower share of its GDP on public child-care than almost any other rich country, and is the only rich country that refuses to provide mothers with paid maternity leave. Barack Obama needs to measure up to his campaign rhetoric about “real family values”.

Still, these nagging problems should not overshadow the dramatic progress that women have made in recent decades. During the second world war, when America’s menfolk were off at the front, the government had to summon up the image of Rosie the Riveter, with her flexed muscle and “We Can Do It” slogan, to encourage women into the workforce. Today women are marching into the workplace in ever larger numbers and taking a sledgehammer to the remaining glass ceilings.

Posted via email from LJJ Speaks!

Wednesday, December 30, 2009

Puppies, Piano & Party!

Posted via web from LJJ Speaks!

Un Resolutions by Judy Shapiro - 9 Digital Marketing Mistakes Not To Make Next Year

9 Digital Marketing Mistakes I Won't Make Next Year

Common Sense, Real Results and Shiny-Object Restraint Will Rule My Marketing Plans Next Year

Judy Shapiro
--> We all know about New Year's resolutions. We make these decisions about what we'll do in the next year with good intentions, but we also know that usually, one by one, they go by the way side. So this year, for a change, I've started to make "un-resolutions" -- things I am determined not to do in 2010.

  1. I will not get seduced by any new digital marketing toy just because some industry pundit thinks it's the coolest thing to hit the street. Nor will I believe every promise made by every new marketing technology company.
  2. I will not abandon common sense in digital marketing and be blinded by digital agencies' promises that their "new" campaigns will go viral and get millions of people engaged. I will continue to listen to my gut and if it sounds too good to be true, that's a red flag warning I will heed.
  3. I will not abandon newspaper, magazines, radio and other forms of traditional media if it is the right vehicle. No matter how sexy digital media may seem because of the perceived lower cost, I will continue to create integrated programs that weave together the best of both the traditional and digital worlds.
  4. I will not give up my attachment to e-mail marketing. Sorry folks -- but e-mail marketing done well drives real business results. If your e-mail campaign did not work, either you had a bad list or an inadequate call-to-action or maybe your agency did not know what they were doing.
  5. I will not be fooled into thinking that the ad market is going to rebound in 2010. Nope. The ad market will continue to be buffeted by the tides of an evolving economic landscape and by consumers' ever fickle attraction to new tech toys like mobile devices. These trends will continue to dampen ad revenue for publishers for some time to come.
  6. I will not blindly follow Google as they chow down every tech industry from telecom to digital publishing in their relentless march toward digital dominance. In the process, they stifle competition and kill real innovation by companies who deserve to succeed.
  7. I will not diminish my slavish devotion to data-driven marketing no matter what new platforms come out that can behaviorally target any audience any way I wish. I know, I know -- the BT folks can slice and dice an audience so many ways that it makes a marketer salivate. But unless I can see, touch and feel the data, I will pass for now.
  8. I will not start following every Tom, Dick and Jane to gain more Twitter followers. OK, so I only have about 185 folks following me but at least I know they read what I tweet. Quality, not quantity, is what drives social media.
  9. And my final un-resolution: I will not try appear to be "30-something" (with a suitable amount of hair product) just because I love digital marketing. I know that the median age of people in digital marketing tends to be 27, but my depth in this space has yielded real-world, hard-won recognition. What you see (gray hair and all) is what you get.

What are your New Year's "un-resolutions"?  

Posted via email from LJJ Speaks!

U.S. "it will take more than a recession to keep country down" ... Forbes Article by Joel Kotkin - nice read

Don't Give Up On The U.S.

Joel Kotkin, 12.29.09, 12:01 AM EST

It will take more than a recession to keep the country down

If the U.S. were a stock, it would be trading at historic lows. The budget deficit is out of control, the economy is anemic and the political system is controlled by academic ideologues and Chicago hacks. Opposing them is a force largely comprised of know-nothings--to call them Neanderthals would be too complimentary.

Not surprisingly, many Americans have become pessimistic. Two in three adults now fear their children will be worse off than they are. Nearly 40% think China will become the world's dominant power in the next 20 years, as indicated by a recent survey.

Yet, in spite of everything, I would still place my long-term bets on the U.S. Here's why:

1. The U.S. is the only advanced country in the world with viable demographics. By 2030, all our major rivals, save India, will be declining, with ever-larger numbers of retirees and a shrinking labor force. By 2050 Germany, Japan and South Korea could approach having twice as many people over 65 per capita as the U.S. By then, the U.S. will have 400 million people, which may be more than the entire EU and three times the population of our former archrival Russia.

2. In terms of energy resources, the U.S., combined with Canada, is the second richest region in the world after the Middle East. The country possesses vast resources of natural gas, about 90 years' worth, as well as strong areas for wind power. Given America's past profligacy, the country could derive considerable savings with even modest conservation efforts.

3. America remains the world's agricultural superpower, with the most arable land on the planet. With another 3 billion people expected on the planet by 2050, the U.S. should enjoy a continuing boom in food exports.

4. Military power matters now and in the future. We are not living in a Star Trek future of earthly harmony. The U.S. leads in military technology and, yes, our martial spirit remains a positive factor, despite the portrayals from Hollywood. For all its missteps, the U.S. military has achieved its strictly war-fighting missions--in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as a host of smaller conflicts--over the past 20 years. Meanwhile, Europe and Japan have taken themselves out of the military game, and it will be decades before China will be ready for a head-to-head challenge.

5. There is no large country that comes close to the U.S. as an entrepreneurial hotbed (Taiwan, Israel and Hong Kong come close but are far smaller). The recent Legatum Prosperity Index showed the U.S. remains by far the largest generator of new ideas and companies on the planet.

Of course, all these critical advantages could be squandered by fecklessness. The empowered American left--in sharp contrast to the tradition that runs from Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman all the way to Bill Clinton--often envisions the U.S. as a country headed into the dustbin of history, and deservedly so.

Leftist historian Immanuel Wallerstein, for example, asserts that the U.S. has been "a fading global power" since the 1970s. The only question now, he suggests, is "whether the United States can devise a way to descend gradually, with minimum damage to the world, and to itself." Another leading liberal analyst, Parag Khanna, envisions a "shrunken" America that is lucky to eke out a meager existence between a "triumphant China" and a "retooled Europe."The traditionally pro-American right increasingly shares this pessimism, albeit for different reasons. With Obama and the Democrats in power, many conservatives, including such keen observers as Charles Krauthammer and Victor Davis Hanson, believe the country has hit the historical skids.

Yet declinism is often overstated. Today, only someone delusional would suggest that once widely feared Japan, soon to fall to third place (behind China) as an economic power, constitutes a serious threat to American preeminence. However, the fantasy of a European resurgence remains deeply embedded among American policy wonks and academics. It is a firmly held belief despite the continent's decades of slow growth, demilitarization, disastrous demographics and mounting budget woes, particularly on its southern and eastern fringes.

On the other hand, China and India represent true ascendant economies of the next decade and beyond. China's rise has led one writer, the Guardian's Martin Jacques, author of When China Rules the World, to suggest that America must "learn to bow" before the great power of the 21st century.

Yet for all their impressive growth, neither China nor India possesses either the institutional strengths or natural resources of the U.S. China's current boom has much to do with an orgy of money-printing that would make Barack Obama blush. Real estate in some places is turning bubblish. There are reports of vacancy rates as high as 50% in Shanghai's commercial market.

India, as anyone who has spent time there knows, remains a highly fragmented and largely impoverished country. It will be a great power of the future, but a very poor one, which will take many decades, even a century, to approach even a decent fraction America's current per capita income.

Often overlooked as well is America's unique advantage as an inclusive multiracial society. Over the past decade America has produced two African-American Secretaries of State and one President. America remains unique in its ability to absorb different races, religions and cultures, an increasingly critical factor in maintaining global preeminence.

What Americans need most now is to develop polcies that build on our essential strengths. Some tech enthusiasts and members of the Obama Administration claim that "the age of infrastructure is over." However, in reality there is no way to assure a decent future for the next 100 million Americans without a major investment in everything from roads and broadband to transmission lines, water systems and basic skills training

Some conservatives may oppose such a domestic surge, but the investment reflects a strong American tradition. The critical issue will be to make sure a commitment to infrastructure does not morph into a Washington-led industrial policy that would inevitably reward the well connected and stunt our innovative edge.

In the end, Americans must remain true to our individualist traditions. Compared with Europeans, who instinctively look to government for guidance, the vast majority of Americans still believe that hard work is the key to self-improvement. Our primary economic asset continues to lie with entrepreneurial spirit and adaptability.

In the coming decade, American success will require precisely this blend of public support and private initiative. If the U.S. stays true to its unique traditions, it will remain the world's best investment for decades to come.

Joel Kotkin is a distinguished presidential fellow in urban futures at Chapman University. He is also an adjunct fellow at the Legatum Institute in London and serves as executive editor of newgeography.com. He writes the weekly New Geographer column for Forbes. His latest book, The Next Hundred Million: America in 2050, will be published by Penguin in February 2010.

Posted via email from LJJ Speaks!

LJj Speaks: When a day comes where you feel up against a wall, ask someone for a boost up and start the ascent!

Posted via email from LJJ Speaks!

Tuesday, December 29, 2009

By @FastCompany - Kick off the year in amazing shoes! Seriously... people walk in these?!!! http://ow.ly/QK4s

wow what pictures of stilts in fashion action!


http://ow.ly/QK4s

Posted via email from LJJ Speaks!

LJj Speaks BlogPost: Re-Energize OLD Resolutions!

I always try my best to think of a New Year Resolution that will make a difference. I want one that means something to me, one that I will keep!  Last year I created a google doc to track my resolution of exercising every day, adding my weight weekly and counting my calorie and beverage intake.  I also put a column in to briefly state who I met with in work and life. The last time I opened it (I just checked) was February 26, 2009.  I also checked my weight and I have to admit that since my 2009 resolution, I have gained 8 pounds!  Now that is being honest in my failings! 

This year I spoke with Tony Gates, Professional coach and motivational guru.  He shared with me three tips that I can use to help me make a resolution that will make an impact. 
Already I can see what I did last year that was so “wrong”

1) Make ONE resolution and make it public.   If you take a look at what I did last year I made about 10 resolutions and incorporated them into one place for tracking. I didn’t tell anyone about the resolution.  Deep down I want to lose weight and exercise more.  Instead of making my resolution “I will exercise three times per week - I made it part of a litany of resolutions that became overwhelming.  I immediately underperformed in each resolution I made. The consequences of this are visible for all to see.

2) Dig Deep and make the resolution matter to you in a very personal way.   Tony says that a resolution is important.  Resolutions help us review what we have been doing in our life that has made an impact for the good or bad.  It’s critical for us to make a resolution that has meaning, one that brings great joy or a feeling of accomplishment.  It’s also important to hold yourself accountable and have others help you stay accountable for the resolution.

3) Do not separate personal and professional resolutions.  There is no difference between a personal and a professional resolution. You cannot wear a different mask in your personal and professional life.  Tony says if you try to build two different lives the wall you have built will come down and expose the real person you are.  Begin now to knock the wall down and be honest in your resolution.  Your resolution will impact you in all facets of your life and cannot be separated.

To Tony Gates top three tips for  resolutions that makes an impact I will add two more.  

4) Congratulate yourself.  Tell people when you’ve hit a milestone on your resolution. Share the good news.  Celebrate when you do well and seek support when you fall. 

5) Put the NEW in the resolution daily. Software company owner and social networking philanthropist Paul Jendrasiak says he doesn’t make resolutions because he looks at each day and faces it head on with vigor. He makes a new year resolution every day and then he tackles it.  For those who are not quite ready to embrace that organizational brilliance, choose to make your ONE resolution fresh every day. Keep it in a place where you see it. You can even go so far as to set an alarm each day that shows up on your calendar with your resolution on it!  

With all I wrote above it’s time to make my New Year Resolution. This resolution is very specific and is very personal to me.  I know that when it becomes reality it will have a huge impact on me.  It is a very “visual” resolution and studies show that I will become more profitable and content as my resolution is achieved.  Thanks to Tony and ALL of my colleagues, along with my friends and family I know I will be held accountable. I resolve to lose 25 pounds in 2010.  Let it be written. Let it be done.  

You can reach Tony Gates in Facebook, Linked IN and Twitter:  TonyGates48
On Twitter:

On LinkedIn:

You can reach Paul Jendrasiak : 
On Twitter:

On LinkedIn:

Connect to  Lynne Jarman-Johnson

Posted via email from LJJ Speaks!

Links to @Mashable's Facebook Guidebook and Twitter Guidebook!

Here is your ONE source for Facebook & Twitter How To's, Updates, Nifty Tricks of the Trade!

FaceBook Guidebook: http://mashable.com/guidebook/facebook/

Twitter Guidebook: http://mashable.com/guidebook/twitter/


Facebook: http://bit.ly/8lge9d
Twitter: http://bit.ly/tQRTq


Happy Following, Friending, Twittering and More!

Posted via email from LJJ Speaks!

SmartBrief on Leadership: Thank those around you for a year well done!

Ways to Thank Employees for a Year-Well Done

In a tough year it's more important than ever to say thanks.

By Roy Saunderson, president, Recognition Management Institute

At the end of this year not all companies are feeling jolly. Large holiday gatherings may not be fiscally sound however there are still options for you to show your employees you recognize their support and service. With employees working more for less, here are a few ideas for you to extend a meaningful and sincere end of year thank you for their diligent contributions.

  • Write Thank You Letters
    Enlist other supervisors and managers' help to identify the contributions of each employee over the past year. State your appreciation loud and clear in the letter and thank them for hanging in there through a tough year.
  • Meet and Greet
    Arrange for your CEO to walk through every department and shake the hands of everyone in the office. The commitment and authenticity of your leader will come through and his time and personal thanks will go a long way.
  • Give the Gift of Time.
    Recognize your outstanding employees with paid time off such as a half or full day off to allow them to spend time with their family and friends or to just relax.
  • Social Network Your Thanks!
    Through tweets, company-wide e-mail and web-posting -- list this year's accomplishments by thanking the key people involved. This will not only allow employees to keep engaged in company happenings, but will also reassure employees that their hard work has not been forgotten. They will appreciate being cited by name.
  • One-on-one Meetings
    Make sure your managers are encouraged to take time out for 1:1 sessions with employees. Staying connected, learning what their professional goals are along with finding out how their personal lives may have changed (kids in college, newborns, etc.) will allow you to manage day to day in a more positive way to achieve the most.
  • Be Happy
    No matter the budget -- holiday time should always be a fun time with an atmosphere of appreciation. Say thanks, be helpful and mindful of everyone in the room. Appreciation should never be just actions -- attitude is what counts!

Roy Saunderson is President of Recognition Management Institute, a division of Rideau, Inc. which designs and manages employee recognition and reward programs making a difference in workplace morale, increased productivity and profits. www.realrecognition.com

Posted via email from LJJ Speaks!

SmartBrief on Leadership: Trusting Leaders to Get Back To Basics

Business leaders to get back to basics


Heading out of a decade that began ignobly with the greatest corporate collapse of all time - Enron Corp. - and closed out with the most ginormous financial bailout of Wall Street ever witnessed, the next 10 years for business leaders are expected to be a recalibration of the fundamentals.

"I think what's happened over the last decade is that too many people got enamoured with the bottom line and not so much with building the long-term sustainability of their businesses," says Glenn Rowe, associate professor, strategic management, and director, executive MBA program, Richard Ivey School of Business in London, Ont.

Indeed, experts agree that in the current complex global business environment, no single model of leadership fits the broad range of situations that leaders encounter daily.

Leadership qualities are constant, yet fluid. Those that were important a century ago - for example, integrity, leading by example, motivating people, developing talent, customer satisfaction, creating and maintaining a competitive advantage - remain vital today. Still, other qualities have been less enduring, proving to be panaceas for their time.

As a new decade approaches, the Financial Post canvassed some of the top business schools in Canada to ask what they anticipate the leadership challenges will be and how they are adapting their curriculums to accommodate the emerging trends.

Almost everyone agrees that the fundamentals are important for developing good leaders.

Alex Kondra, dean at the faculty of business, Centre for Innovative Management, Athabasca University in Alberta, says the tech bubble and the scandals of subprime mortgages and asset-backed commercial paper were the result of a lack of focus on the basics.

"A lot of people were running around saying companies had to be valued differently because the old model didn't reflect the new reality. The old model did, it was the emphasis on greed that drove valuations," he says. "There was a heavy emphasis on style over substance, especially with CEOs. People were living larger and it was really detrimental to organizations and destroyed some companies. So to a certain degree there will be a retrenchment and a return to fundamentals."

Ronald Burke concurs.

A professor emeritus of organizational behaviour, Schulich MBA program, at York University in Toronto, Prof. Burke predicts a major challenge for business leaders in the next decade is "be results-oriented and be accountable for getting things done." Not only that, he says top executives also need to hold their staff accountable going forward.

"Too many leaders haven't been able to create environments that capture hearts and minds of their people," he argues. And because there's less money to throw around in bonuses, there'll be a premium on non-financial incentives, and leaders will need to be more inspiring to get their people to buy into their visions and programs.

"Leaders have to use the next decade to regain trust, not only of their people but of the population at large," Prof. Burke says. "Right now, there's a ton of cynicism on Main Street about Wall Street, and that's got to be restored."

Generally, business schools teach value creation, value capture and value distribution with a view of balancing the interests of all the stakeholders.

Often, companies are driven mostly to achieve the short-term, bottom-line results to appease the marketplace and shareholders at the expense of longer-term considerations. Academics agree that senior leaders in the next decade are going to be under pressure to take the longer view, by investing in assets such as research and development, and human resources, to cement the foundation of companies and maintain their future sustainability.

Ultimately, the goal is to develop CEOs and top managers who understand the synergistic combination of making value-based decisions that enhance companies to keep them sustainable in the long run while maintaining their short-term financial stability.

"We need to develop people who have a sense of what is it is to be a strategic leader," says Ivey's Prof. Rowe. "It's the ability to be fluent with those with whom you work, to voluntarily make decisions on a day-to-day basis and enhance the long-term viability of the organization. It's the combination of being a manager and a visionary with his or her feet nailed to the ground."

Sustainability has a new urgency because of the speed of technology and its impact on decision-making and communication.

While corporate leaders have always had to understand their core technologies, they haven't always understood their larger impact on various stakeholders. In the future, they'll have to be more sensitive because corporate decisions resonate almost instantly across the globe, and that means almost every corporate commitment now must involve discussions about the impact on employees, the environment, customers, and other stakeholders, in a way that they haven't before.

All business schools offer courses on ethics, but Prof. Kondra says the strategic planning to determine the curriculum at Athabasca is constantly adapting to the changing world of business.

For example, he says, the school no longer offers separate courses in e-commerce, ethics and social corporate responsibility because they're ubiquitous. Instead, those subjects are now integrated fully throughout the MBA program.

"It's not so much that we don't do it, it's just the way we teach them that has changed," he says.

Ivey is also tinkering with its program, according to Prof. Rowe, not necessarily phasing out courses, but adding more to cover contemporary issues.

The emerging trends getting more attention in the classroom these days are managing cultural diversity, enhancing communications skills and team building.

Increasingly, leaders will need to be more aware of the impact of globalization on all aspects of their businesses. In many ways, that's a return to entrepreneurship and exploiting niches.

At the same time, globalization has increased the need for cultural sensitivity not only in new markets, but within organizations that are experiencing cross-cultural diversity.

Gone are the days when almost every company in the United States and Canada was run by white, males who presided over a homogeneous workforce.

And with Canadian business leaders increasingly peddling their wares outside the country, courses in international business are intended to make people more self-aware of their own biases and assumptions.

"In the next decade, leaders are going to have to be more flexible and tolerant in the diversity of their workforces," says Prof. Burke.

In a complex and fast-paced world, leaders in the future will need to learn how to ask more questions, and have fewer of the answers. Top business leaders know the corner office doesn't have all the answers - and they shouldn't pretend to know everything either.

Increasingly, more senior executives will manage employees who know more about products and services than their bosses. In a world of multi-channel information sharing, team building is becoming paramount.

"The world is becoming increasingly complex and it's moving faster and faster with a greater amount of information," says Prof. Kondra. "It makes it really hard to manage any situation without the right team to support the massive flow of information at the rate of change, you will be lost because you can't do it by yourself."

Still, too many CEOs and top managers are happy to be surrounded by those who seek reinforcement of their opinions. Very few champion new ideas and disruptive points of view.

"Too many people are happy to be ‘yes' men and women," says Prof. Burke. "For a leader to be effective in the next decade, I don't think that would be doing you a great service."

In the end, the experts agree the challenges in the decade ahead are about keeping up with the complexity of business and the rapid pace of change, while trying to avoid repeating the mistakes of the past.

ttedesco@nationalpost.com

Posted via email from LJJ Speaks!

LJj Speaks: There is an "I" in Organize - there's also an "organ"... which means Organizing brings music to my eyes!

Posted via email from LJJ Speaks!

Monday, December 28, 2009

New Facebook App Brings Muziic to your profile! Thanks @Mashable!

Muziic Brings Tons of Music to your Facebook Profile

Posted:
 28 Dec 2009 04:01 AM PST

When you search for a music application for Facebook, what do you want from it? Personally, I’d like some radio stations, the ability to search and listen to specific tunes, and finally, the ability to create playlists and share them with your friends.

Muziic is a new Facebook app that does exactly that. In contrast to many other music-related apps on Facebook, as soon as you install it, you’ll be able to listen to music – and lots of it. Besides the featured songs, and the ability to search for albums, artists and songs and listen to them (the actual music is pulled from YouTube), the most welcome part of the app is a list of online radio stations, organized by category, similar to the one found in iTunes.

All of this comes with very few restricions; you can listen to complete songs, you can tune into radio stations for as long as you like, and you won’t be bombarded by queries and obtrusive ads in the process. From the mouth of the app’s creator, David J. Nelson:

“With Muziic, the goal was to create an application that actually gives Facebook users what they want in a music app. As someone who is not a big fan of most Facebook apps, I wanted to keep the experience clean, functional and user friendly. No incentivized garbage, forced friend invites, etc… Just a music app that delivers.”

Muziic also enables you to easily create, save and share playlists, and comes with a quite useful Facebook tab that displays your listening habits, similar to the way it’s done in Last.FM. On it, you can find user’s playlists, recently played songs, favorite radio stations, top artists and top tracks.

My favorite part of the app is the fact that it doesn’t go to far. If you want music quizzes, trivia, or games, you’ll have to go elsewhere. But if you’re only interested in music, you’d do well to give Muziic a try.

Posted via email from LJJ Speaks!

LJj Speaks: Let's resolve to make our mission attainable goals and then build the steps we need to attain them!

Posted via email from LJJ Speaks!

Wednesday, December 23, 2009

LJj Speaks: When you are on a deadline. Clear your mind. Jump start your passion. Drink Coffee and Eat Chocolate.

Posted via email from LJJ Speaks!

Top Searched Google Terms for 2009 by Marketing Charts

‘Facebook’ Top Searched Term for 2009; Google Top Website

“Facebook” was the top-searched term in the US in 2009, accounting for 0.67% of all internet searches, according to an analysis of the year’s top 300 search terms by Experian Hitwise, which also found that four variations of the popular social networking site were among the top-25 terms.

This year marks the first year that Facebook has captured the #1 spot, and the fourth straight year that social network search terms have topped the “most-searched” list, Experian said. In 2008, MySpace held the #1 slot.

Facebook moved up from the #10 spot in 2008. MySpace was the second most-searched term in 2009, followed by Craigslist, YouTube and Yahoo Mail. Analysis of the search terms reveals that social networking-related continue to dominate the results, accounting for 2.48% of the top 300 searches.

Adding up common search terms - e.g., facebook and facebook.com - Facebook terms accounted for 1.09% of all searches. MySpace terms accounted for 1.02%, Yahoo terms accounted for 0.95%, Google terms accounted for 0.63%, and Craigslist terms accounted for 0.62%.

Google Top-Visited Website

N0t surprisingly, Google was the top-visited website for the second straight year, and accounted for 6.70% of all US visits between January and November 2009. Yahoo Mail accounted for 4.44% of visits, followed by Facebook (4.26%), Yahoo (3.36%) and MySpace (3%).

Adding up common properties  -  e.g., yahoo.com and mail.yahoo.com - Yahoo properties accounted for 10.60%  of all US visits. the analysis found. Google properties accounted for 9.93%, and Facebook properties accounted for 4.26%.

The top 50 websites accounted for 39% of all US visits between January and November 2009, Experian reported.

A similar analysis by The Nielsen Company - which employed a different methodology - also found Google to be the top web brand in 2009. In Nielsen’s ranking, Google was followed by Yahoo, MSN/Windows Live/Bing, YouTube and Facebook.

Posted via email from LJJ Speaks!

Tuesday, December 22, 2009

How can a naked christmas tree named Fred teach us lessons in life and work?

This year we have a Naked Christmas Tree in our home.  The tree started dropping needles before it went into its stand.  Our family felt compelled to “stay with tradition” and we tried to keep it as healthy as a live cut down tree can be. The water became stale as the tree dropped more needles. This tree was not thirsty. It was just plain dead.  Instead of tossing it before the presents were even wrapped, we chose to be creative and “dress up needle-less Fred!” (our new name for a tree that looked like something from the stone age, petrified for eternity).   First we held the tree-shaking event. We brought the tree back outside, shook off every needle and returned it to its’ rightful place indoors.  Then we had the “Tree Trimming” party where we decorated Fred.  The tree in the daylight leaves much to be desired.  At night with the glow of the lights (only turned on once never to be turned on again in case of a fire) the tree was quite beautiful.  Best of all, our tree will serve it’s ultimate purpose, a hanger of memories for all to see and an umbrella to protect gifts of love. 

How can a Naked Christmas Tree named Fred teach us lessons in life and work?

Lesson #1 Stripping an idea bare can bear new fruit.
When history and tradition die out along with the needles, you can make new ideas come alive.  Often projects we are working on can become brittle and stale.  We leave them to die on a shelf.  What began as a great idea or strategy turns into a 3 ring-binder on a shelf.  Take the time to reexamine the concepts and see what ideas you can dust off and bring to life.  Your original idea may die on the vine, but that idea connected to a new partner, contact or technology just may be your answer for success!

Lesson #2 Shaking off the perceptions brings sharp reality to the table.
Once you see a project slipping off the track you may want to throw up your hands and just give up.  It’s easier to just quit than forge ahead and see it through.  Yes, it takes time to shake off the needles and the old dead wood.  Seeing the bare necessities of your work will help you get back on the right track.  You may deter from your original path, but a new path can be an even safer, faster, more profitable route.

Lesson #3 People hang on to the fun while the work is being done.
Hanging on to the fun during a project is hard work. The enormity of a situation can cause stress and anxiety.  Turn that stress into action with brainstorming and team building sessions focusing on the issue.  Direct your goals to build solutions.  When you work together to overcome obstacles you will have much more joy in your work. You’ll be able to celebrate the outcomes together as well!  

Lesson #4 When work gives you needles - don’t point fingers.
Work can bring sharp discussions to the table when production stalls and teams feel failure.  Pointing teams in a new direction works much better at keeping morale high. Pointing fingers is useless.  At the critical moment of deciding which you will do - choose to point to the positive steps that have been made and the positive ones you can make together.

Finally, a Naked Christmas Tree, just like a clean, new project can bring you less work later.  There’s no cleaning up the mess from a tree that has already shed it’s needles! No mess is less stress!

Posted via email from LJJ Speaks!

New Facebook "clickjacking" warning from @Mashable:

A new Facebook clickjacking attack is making the rounds, and this one is as sly as they come. The attack spreads through a malicious website, http://fb.59.to, leading users to this YouTube video.

The method used to spread the link is particularly interesting. A Facebook users sees a post on a friend’s wall, with a thumbnail and the caption “New Pix”. Clicking on this link will lead you to the aforementioned video, but it will also spread by posting the same link on your own wall, seemingly without your intervention.

The trick is in the fake turing test, seemingly set up to determine if the user is human. After you click on the link on Facebook, you’re asked to find the blue button amongst a number of multicolored buttons. This button is actually the Facebook share button; by clicking on it, you’re actually willingly sharing the link on Facebook, but the entire Facebook page is concealed with the use of two IFRAME elements (for a detailed explanation of how the attack works, see here).

Needless to say, this type of attack can easily trick the user into opening something far more dangerous than a YouTube video. You should, as always, be very careful when clicking on any suspicious links on Facebook. This attack currently works only in Firefox and Chrome, but we wouldn’t be surprised to see “fixed” and more dangerous versions of it soon.

Posted via email from LJJ Speaks!

More than 90% of Americans remain current on their mortgage and credit cards.... more from WSJ Opinion

By ZACHARY KARABELL

As the economic crisis has eased in recent months, a questionable international consensus has emerged: The global economy needs to be rebalanced. "We cannot follow the same policies that led to such imbalanced growth," President Barack Obama said during his Asia trip last month. European Central Bank head Jean-Claude Trichet declared in September that "imbalances have been at the roots of the present difficulties. If we don't correct them, we'll have the recipe for the next major crisis."

These global "imbalances" supposedly include excessive American consumption, too much trade flowing from Asia to the West and not enough from the U.S. to Asia, and too much saving combined with insufficient spending by Chinese consumers. But what if the whole notion of global imbalances is a myth, and that policies to reverse them only make things worse?

The blunt fact is that at no point in the past century has there been anything resembling a global economic equilibrium.

Consider the heyday of the "American century" after World War II, when Western European nations were ravaged by war, and the Soviet Union and its new satellites slowly rebuilding. In 1945, the U.S. accounted for more than 40% of global GDP and the preponderance of global manufacturing. The country was so dominant it was able to spend the equivalent of hundreds of billions of dollars to regenerate the economies of Western Europe via the Marshall Plan, and also of Japan during a seven year military occupation. By the late 1950s, 43 of the world's 50 largest companies were American.

The 1970s were hardly balanced—not with the end of the gold standard, the oil shocks and the 1973 Arab oil embargo, inflation and stagflation, which spread from the U.S. through Latin America and into Europe.

The 1990s were equally unbalanced. The U.S. consumed and absorbed much of the available global capital in its red-hot equity market. And with the collapse of the Soviet Union and the economic doldrums of Germany and Japan, the American consumer assumed an ever-more central position in the world. The innovations of the New Economy also gave rise to a stock-market mania and overshadowed the debt crises of South America and the currency implosion of South Asia—all of which were aggravated by the concentration of capital in the U.S. and the paucity of it in the developing world. When the tech bubble burst in 2000, it had little to do with these global dynamics and everything to do with a glut of telecommunication equipment in the U.S., and stock-market exuberance gone wild.

When officials and economists today speak of correcting global imbalances, it is unclear what benchmark they have in mind.

So-called excessive American consumption, East-West trade flows, Chinese savings and the like were not responsible for the recent crisis. That was instead triggered by massive misplaced bets on the U.S. housing market and trillions of dollars of derivatives built upon that flimsy foundation.

Yes, many have woven a compelling narrative of how the relationship between China and the U.S.—distorted by China's fixed and nonconvertible currency on the one hand and America's debt-fueled appetites on the other—led to massive flows of capital out of the U.S. But that money flowed right back into the U.S. in the form of Chinese purchases of Treasury bonds, mortgage-backed securities and other dollar-denominated assets, which then flowed into our banking system, which then made its way back to U.S. business and to the Treasury, some of which then circulated back into China.

What some see as imbalances can also be described as a system of capital and goods in constant motion. Chinese reserves and U.S. government debt didn't trigger the meltdown, nor did U.S. consumers cause the meltdown. It wasn't even U.S. consumer debt—after all, more than 90% of Americans have remained current on their credit cards and their mortgages. The real (and much messier) cause of the meltdown was a potent brew of financial innovation, electronic and instantaneous flow of capital, greed on the part of banks and investors world-wide, against a backdrop of an economic fusion between China and the U.S. that kept interest rates low and inflation lower.

Today's consensus sounds very much like the orthodoxy of yesteryear—let each nation be its own system in equilibrium, interacting with other systems to create one mega-balanced system. Yet such balance has only existed in theory and only ever will.

Indeed, if the crisis of the past year teaches us anything it should be that forcing reality to conform to abstract theory is a sure recipe for disaster. Forced to act with expediency in the moment, the central banks and governments of the world did a surprisingly good job of triage during the economic emergency that swept the globe. The eclectic demands of a crisis outweighed models and theories, and that was a good thing.

Now that the crisis has eased, the greatest danger is that our collective belief in how the world should work drowns out the creative nimbleness of policy that adapts to the world as it is actually working. Policies that might stem from the global imbalances consensus include American government incentives to increase domestic savings. This sounds good, but not if it leads to underinvestment in innovation, education and infrastructure.

It could also lead Chinese officials to attempt to shift away from exports and state spending. Over the long term this might be beneficial, but it could wreak havoc on domestic Chinese growth and global supply chains if it is done under the erroneous belief that urgent action is required. For its part, the European Union rightly claims that it has not been a primary cause of the perceived imbalances. But its leaders have been central to pushing that thesis and urging China and the U.S. to redress them.

Thankfully, there is less risk of the Chinese government upsetting their apple cart than there is of the American government acting precipitously.

Mr. Karabell is president of River Twice Research and the author, most recently, of "Superfusion: How China and America Became One Economy" (Simon & Schuster, 2009).

Posted via web from LJJ Speaks!

LJj Speaks: Just keep plugging away!

Posted via email from LJJ Speaks!

Thursday, December 17, 2009

34% of women say social media is favorite leisure activity compared to 10% men.

Social Media Users Want to Be Heard

DECEMBER 17, 2009 -Emarketers Daily Intelligence

A look at user attitudes


While social media users may not find social sites quite as trustworthy as traditional sources of news, according to research from Crowd Science they do see it as an important communications medium—for better and for worse.

Users want to be heard. Overall, 45% reported liking when others notice them—leading some to stretch the truth or reveal too much personal information. Young people were especially vulnerable to activities that might haunt them later.

But 36% believed others are simply interested in what they have to say. That shouldn’t come as too much of a surprise to marketers, who know many users will tell all their contacts about good (and bad) experiences with products and services.

Females lived up to their reputation as prime targets of marketers seeking the benefits of earned media. Among users over age 30, women were significantly more likely than men to think others wanted to hear what they thought.

Attitudes of Online Social Media Users Worldwide Regarding Their Use of Social Media, by Age and Gender, August 2009 (% of respondents)

In addition, women overall were more than three times as likely as men to say online social media was their favorite leisure activity.

Though not everything appearing on social media is trustworthy, nearly one-half of users responding to the survey claimed they could “easily” tell whether information they got from social media was true. Less than one-quarter disagreed. These savvy users believe they can spot the difference between the real deal and insincere efforts.

Attitudes of Online Social Media Users Worldwide Toward Social Media, August 2009 (% of respondents)

While face-to-face contact with friends was generally preferred, about one-third of users said they would rather communicate by social media than by telephone.

Posted via email from LJJ Speaks!

LJj Speaks: The latest bell and the greatest whistle is only as good as the time you invest to read and understand the instructions.

Same is true for employees - training and education don't stop with the hire.

Posted via email from LJJ Speaks!

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

From the We Need A Little Fun ... Reuters: Court Rules in One Armed Bandit Decision... "legal innovation"

TOULOUSE, France (Reuters) - A French court has split the jackpot from a casino slot machine between the woman who put in the money and the man who pulled the lever, ending months of argument between the two.

Marie-Helene Jarguel walked off with over 2 million euros ($2.91 million) in March after a bet of 50 euros on a one-armed bandit, only for her gambling partner Francis Sune to contest her gain based on the fact that he activated the machine.

A court in the southwestern city of Montpellier ruled on Tuesday that Jarguel should keep 80 percent of the earnings while the rest should go to Sune, a judicial source said.

The ruling was a legal innovation. The judges noted that there was "no judicial definition of the winner in a slot machine game."

Posted via email from LJJ Speaks!

Today's 10 Worst Phrases to Use in Business (Thanks Steve!) And Linked In Status Posts!

This morning I wrote the following post: "LJj Speaks: When someone says ethically speaking, do you wonder if that is a precursor for unethically speaking?"

It must have struck a cord because here's some you've posted back:

"How about this one: "just between you and me."..."everyone already knows." Paul C. Spoelstra

"No offense, but..." Prepare to be offended!" Matt Kaminski

"I agree. Another one that slips is "To be honest with you." Does this mean, "I have been lying all along." Trying to change this one too!" Paul C. Spoelstra


And this from Steve Atwell he found this blog from Frances Cole Jones: 

Today's 10 Worst Phrases to Use in Business

By Frances Cole Jones: 

In January 2009, YouGov published its list of the 10 worst business sayings. Some I more than agreed with ("thinking outside of the box," "blue-sky thinking," "heads up"); some didn't bug me too much ("at the end of the day," "going forward," "credit crunch"). But it also got me thinking about my own version of the 10 worst business sayings.

Consequently, I compiled my own list, complete with definitions and -- most importantly -- the reasons they were included.  

The first three top my list for their gross factor, pure and simple. Why? Because regardless of the people or situation in question, I've found that the overt or indirect referencing of bodily functions in a business environment gets me down.

1. Pick your brain: Substituted when someone simply wants to ask you something.

"Do you mind if I just pick your brain?"

2. Throw it against the wall and see what sticks: Often used to describe a haphazard approach to presenting a motley product line, batch of ideas, etc. "Well, let's just throw these against the wall and see what sticks."

3. Sweat equity: Offered up when asking people to give their time and talent, and payment is not available. "We can't pay you your rate now, but -- when we do start making money -- you'll definitely have sweat equity."

The next three were included because of their cliché factor. Like "thinking outside the box" and "blue-sky thinking," their overuse means they no longer catch our attention.

4. It's not rocket science: Used most often when pointing out to someone that the task he's been asked to complete isn't, in fact, complicated. "After all, it's not rocket science."

5. The ball's in your court: This phrase is usually thrown around (pun intended) to let others know that you've reached your limit with regard to handling a situation. "I've now done everything I can. After this, the ball's in your court."

6. Drill down: This is too often used to denote the vigor with which a person or team will be pursuing an objective. "Yes, Bob and I are really going to drill down on that."

The following three made my list thanks to their redundancy:

7. I, personally: Since something that is said by you is, by definition, personal, I see no need to include both words. For example, when you take the "personally" out of the following sentence, the meaning doesn't change. "Well, I, personally, don't think that X should take precedence over Y."

8. Quite unique (and its compatriots "very unique," "really unique" and "most unique"): Despite the fact that things that are unique can't be qualified, I see this all the time. "Our store has the most unique items." Um ... no. You can, however, say, "Our store is filled with unique items." I have no trouble with that.

9. Past history: This one drives me wild every time I hear it, "Well, based on past history ..." History is, by definition, something that occurred in the past, so why on earth say "past"?

And, finally, the most overused phrase in a business context:

10. Urgent (and its frequent companion "crisis"): I include these because, as I'm sure you've discovered, the use of either, or both, of these words does little to resolve what might be going on. Instead, they either ratchet up the tension or make others wonder why you are so out of control. What do I recommend you use instead? I would substitute the use of "immediate" for "urgent," and "situation" for "crisis," as both convey the need for action but leave others room to bring their own skills and intelligence to bear -- while reflecting well on your own.

Frances Cole Jones is the author of "The Wow Factor: The 33 Things You Must (and Must Not) Do to Guarantee Your Edge in Today's Business World." Her company, Cole Media Management, works with clients to enhance their professional and personal presentation skills. She lives in New York City.

Posted via email from LJJ Speaks!

How The 500 Fastest Growing Companies are using social media @jeffbullas

How The Top 500 Fastest Growing Companies Are Using Social Media

by jeffbullas

Interesting study due to the fact it looks at the 500 fastest growing companies in the USA and how they are using Social Media.

 The Center for Marketing Research at the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth recently conducted a new in-depth and statistically significant study on the usage of social media in fast-growing corporations. 

 The new study compares adoption of social media over three years (2007, 2008 and 2009) by the Inc. 500, a list of the fastest-growing private U.S. companies compiled annually by Inc. Magazine. For details about the 2009 Inc. 500 and the complete directory of the included companies, please visit Inc. Magazine’s website at www.Inc.com.

In 2007, the Center’s first study of this group and their use of social media was released and revealed that the Inc. 500 was outpacing the more traditional and larger Fortune 500 companies in their use of social media. For example, at that time, some research showed

  •  8% of the Fortune 500 companies were blogging compared to
  • 19% of the Inc. 500.

This difference continued in 2008 with

  • 16% of the Fortune 500 blogging vs.
  • 39% of the Inc. 500.

And it appears the Inc. 500’s lead in blogging will continue in 2009 with the Inc. 500 now blogging at a rate of

  • 45%. (The update on the Fortune 500 is expected soon.).

Note: There has been a 237% increase in blogging by the USA’s 500 fastest growing companies,it is also interesting to note that significant 41% of those who don’t have a blog are intending to implement one.

This research proves once again that social media has penetrated parts of the business world at a tremendous speed. It also indicates that corporate familiarity with and usage of social media within the Inc. 500 has continued to grow in the past 12 months. 

Questions probed the familiarity of respondents with six prominent social media (blogging, podcasting, online video, social networking, message boards and wikis). In order to maintain the integrity of all comparisons, all those tools studied in the first two studies were included in this followup research.

In 2009, several new tools were added including the popular microblogging service Twitter and other popular social networking sites like Linkedin, Facebook, and MySpace.  

7  Highlights

  1. Social networking continues to lead the way. The technology that continues to be the most familiar to the Inc. 500 is social networking with 75% of respondents in 2009 claiming to be “very familiar with it” (compared to 57% in 2008). Another noteworthy statistic around familiarity is Twitter’s amazing “share of mind” with sixty-two percent of executives reported being familiar with the new microblogging and social networking platform.
  2. The adoption curves for different social media technologies are not all the same. Interestingly, while social networking and blogging have enjoyed growth in actual adoption, the use of message boards, online video, wikis and podcasting has leveled off or declined. The addition of Twitter (considered by respondents to be both a microblogging site and a social networking site) in the latest study shows that an amazing 52% of the Inc. 500 companies are already using this tool for their business.
  3. Regardless of the particular technology, social media matters and is here to stay. Forty-three percent of the 2009 Inc. 500 reported social media was “very important” to their business/marketing strategy. And an incredible 91% of the Inc. 500 is using at least one social media tool in 2009 (up from 77% in 2008). In addition, as they ramp up their usage, the Inc. 500 companies are also seeking to protect themselves legally, with 36% having implemented a formal policy concerning blogging by their employees.
  4. Social Media that has levelled off or declined are
    • Message Boards 28%
    • Online Video 36%
    • Wikis 25%
    • Podcasting 12%
  5. Social Media that has increased
    • Social Networking 80%
    • Blogging 45%
    • Twitter 52%
  6. Online Video though slightly declining in use in corporations, their intent to to adopt appears strong with 36% planning to  to use online video, just behind Blogging
  7. For monitoring conversations online on social media about their brand, 68% of companies were doing this in 2009

Posted via email from LJJ Speaks!

Untitled

LJj Speaks: When someone says ethically speaking, do you wonder if that is a precursor for unethically speaking?

Posted via web from LJJ Speaks!

LJj Speaks: TO DO: Embrace the day or disgrace the day. What will it be? Let's work on Embracing!

Posted via email from LJJ Speaks!

Monday, December 14, 2009

Do you give away your services for free? Great ForbesWomen posts to ponder....

Do You Give Away Your Services For Free?

The ForbesWoman community discusses how to be helpful and build client loyalty while staying true to your business.

http://ads.forbes.com/RealMedia/ads/click_lx.ads/forbes.com/forbeswoman/entrepreneurs/story/L10/1108100103/x92/OasDefault_v5/CC09513421_log_artCoun_091201/CC09513421_log_artCoun_090904.html/52383062336b724c473841414135786b">http://ads.forbes.com/RealMedia/ads/click_lx.ads/forbes.com/forbeswoman/entrepreneurs/story/L10/766771632/x91/OasDefault_v5/CC09513422_log_artCoun_091201/CC09513422_log_artCoun_090901.html/52383062336b724c473841414135786b">
pic

Lida Citroën, a branding and marketing consultant with two decades as a leader in corporate and nonprofit organizations, pressed her lips together when she realized that once again she would've been better off--and better compensated--if she had just kept mum.

"In my enthusiasm and passion for sharing, I tend to give a lot of information, advice and suggestions away ... for free," she posts on ForbesWoman's LinkedIn group. Her confession ends with a plea to others in the group who run their own businesses and set their own rates: "I'd love some suggestions and best practices for getting paid for my knowledge."

"You're not alone," agrees fellow consultant Leslie Knight, who lives near Tulsa, Okla. "As women, our nature is to be helpful and share. I struggle with it as well."

Next up to open up was Kjelene Bertrand: "I've never thought about how much I give away until now," writes the producer and host of Albany, NY's Voices of Success Talk Radio. "The heart that gives gathers! Does that statement suffice for business too? Of course it does my friends! Lida, do you have a page on your Web site for [fees for] services? If so, refer your proposed clients to that page of your site. If they want to pay for it they will. I may have to do the same."

Renne Leatto makes a solid link between the economy and client loyalty. "Unfortunately, the recession has reduced client loyalty, and many businesses would rather get a deal every time rather than patronize the same vendor they know and feel a comfort level with," writes Leatto, president of i. karumbah, an Orlando, Fla.-based creative agency. "It always seems to be a balancing act, and I see professional men dealing with it as well as women. I have a producer friend who has been undercharging and over-delivering in hopes of building client loyalty. Although his work is exceptional, some of the clients he has given the most to in the past couple of years have stabbed him in the back. It's taught me to go in with boundaries drawn, at least in my mind, before I begin a project."

"I too am a big culprit" of dropping pearls of wisdom for free, chimes in Imelda McGrattan, a sales strategist with her own agency in Ireland. "I am learning to give little appetizers now, and then shutting my big mouth! Setting a boundary and then making a formal business appointment. If the value you are adding to a business is more than they are paying for it and you can articulate that, you are on a winner."

Citroën, whose business is based in Greenwood Village, Colo., ponders the comments and adds one more of her own: "I think for some people, the passion for hearing themselves talk is probably driven by a need to seem smart, but for us it comes from our willingness to help, share and inform. Unfortunately, it's sometimes hard to earn a living being helpful."

"I share a lot of my 'free' knowledge with the two nonprofits I'm passionate about," she shares. "To me, helping them helps the communities they serve (children with Down syndrome and children who've been abused). I never hesitate to pour out information, strategy, tips and suggestions. For potential clients, however, there's that fine line between showing competency and giving knowledge away. I love your 'appetizer' suggestions--whet their whistle, but let them pay for the rest."

"I believe in 'fee integrity,'" says Heather Fraser, owner of The Growth Coach-Miami. "I establish the worth of my services and integrate it mentally and strategically in my business. We often undervalue our services. As a result, we attract clients who respond accordingly. We are business owners with expenses to meet. This is the reality we face. Therefore we should expect to be paid handsomely for the fine services provided."

Score one for you, Heather, chimes in Bernadette Phillips, an Irish intuitive coach and motivational speaker. "The worth that we attribute to ourselves is directly linked to the fee that we charge. We indeed do deserve to be 'paid handsomely' for providing excellent services. Therefore, if you give too much of your knowledge and ideas away for free, you somehow I believe diminish the value of your service. Something that works really well is having a 'pay it forward' element built in as part of your business: Those that you choose to assist 'for free' make a commitment to assist others on their way. It's a nice win-win solution for all."

Co-chairman of Young Enterprises, a U.K. business and enterprise education charity, Mala Shah allows herself to sum up the conversation. "Most of us have given away too much for free," she writes. "There are disadvantages and advantages to this: You have to know when to stop giving away free services; and you have to know that the lead you are following is going to bring in business."

How? "Follow your instincts (they have to be strong), and have a good business strategy. I have had two clients on my books for over a year. I have given free consultations on several occasions to both, and I am happy to say that one of the clients has come through with a big contract. I have now put in several proposals to the second client; I have yet to receive a response."

Is Shah worried? Not at all. "I know that I've built up a good trust-based relationship. And when they do want to hire me, they will have to pay the going rate."

Over to you, readers. Are you giving away too much of your services, or have you found the right balance? Please join the conversation in our ForbesWoman LinkedIn group.

ForbesWoman Voices is a new series that highlights the issues and topics that are lighting up the ForbesWoman community networks, including LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter and the ForbesWoman Network. Join us and share your thoughts--in our comments section or in the community--on business and careers, style, tech, health, power and more.

Posted via email from LJJ Speaks!